LA Dead-End Shootout: Burglary Suspect Fires — Officer Chase & Takedown Caught on Bodycam

The night on Oakwood was ordinary until it wasn't. Patrol units were following a lead — a blue Mercedes reported nearby with multiple occupants — when radio chatter turned urgent. “Two shots fired,” someone announced. The phrase sliced through routine, instantly reframing the moment from a typical vehicle check into a dangerous encounter.
Officers converged on a dead-end street near Santa Monica, engines idling, lights flashing. The suspect vehicle stopped; commands were barked to the occupants. Then it happened again: more gunfire echoed. The situation accelerated — officers had to make rapid assessments about cover, containment, and threats inside a confined urban space. A car, a few feet away, became a potential weapon and a source of bullets.
Bodycam sound and radio logs capture the confusion. Voices overlap: “Get ready! Do you see him?” “He’s running — get eyes on the car!” Hands moved, boots hit pavement, and the choreography of a response played out in jagged edits. In those seconds, training matters. Officers positioned themselves to block exits, while others attempted to draw the occupants out without creating crossfire or endangering nearby residents.
Then the suspect scrambled from the vehicle and ran. Officers yelled commands to stop, to show hands, to get on the ground. The man kept moving. The proximity of homes and pedestrians made the chase dangerous; every corner could hide a civilian. Officers had to balance pursuit with protection, keeping their voices loud and clear to assert control and to warn bystanders.
When officers closed the distance, a final burst of gunfire rang out. The transcript notes frantic expletives and “I got the left, I got one,” followed by “clear the waistband.” Those phrases suggest the officers were taking control of the situation: securing the suspect, ensuring weapons were accounted for, and checking for additional threats. The immediate priority shifted from shooting to safety checks and medical assessment if needed.
What the audio doesn't show is the individual human response to such a confrontation. For the officers involved, adrenaline spikes, hands shake, and training must guide movement when fear and urgency push for instinctual reactions. For neighbors, a quiet evening is ruptured by flashes and the thunder of gunfire, leaving lingering questions about safety and community trust. For the suspect and any victims, lives are changed in an instant.
Investigations follow these incidents. Supervisors review footage, analyze whether commands were clear and reasonable, and determine whether the use of force met department policy and legal standards. Review boards, internal affairs, or prosecutors may examine whether other options were available and whether officers adhered to protocols. The context matters: whether the occupants were believed to be committing burglary, whether weapons were visible, and whether the vehicle threatened officers or the public.
Public reaction often mirrors the complexity of the event. Some will defend the officers' split-second decisions as necessary to protect lives. Others will mourn and demand accountability, seeking clarification about whether escalation could have been avoided. Community leaders frequently call for transparency: releasing bodycam footage, providing a timeline, and holding public briefings so that residents can understand the sequence of events and how decisions were made.
Those on the scene carry the event forward in memory. Officers debrief, both to extract lessons and to begin the psychological processing that follows a use-of-force incident. Departments provide resources — counseling, peer support, and training reviews. For civilians and witnesses, the reverberations can appear in neighborhood conversations, local meetings, and the social media posts that frame public perception.
Beyond the procedural aftermath lie policy questions. How do departments train for encounters in tight urban spaces? When does a vehicle become a weapon? How should officers coordinate when shots are exchanged in a residential area? Answers to these questions shape training, equipment choices, and community policing strategies intended to reduce such confrontations.
The recording of that night on Oakwood preserves a compressed arc: a report, a stop, gunfire, a foot chase, and securing of the scene. Each moment is a stark reminder that public safety work often sits on a razor's edge. The hope after such a confrontation is that thorough review brings clarity, that communities and police find ways to prevent future violence, and that the people directly affected begin the slow process of recovery.
He Screamed ‘I’ll Get My Mom!’—Then Turned the Street Into a War Zone


It began like any other routine patrol — a quiet night, a vehicle being towed, officers chatting under the hum of streetlights. But for one cop, this would become the most terrifying night of his career. As he supervised the tow, a white Hyundai flashed past at breakneck speed, disappearing into the darkness. The officer barely had time to mutter,
Hours later, officers found the same car parked in a suburban driveway. They surrounded it, weapons drawn, shouting commands. The driver,
The scene turned chaotic. Dashcams caught officers yelling, “Watch out, Frankie! Get off the street!” as Mark’s car smashed through their perimeter. He wasn’t fleeing — he was
As Mark reversed, then charged again, one officer’s vehicle took the full impact. Inside was a
But the horror wasn’t over. When the adrenaline faded, they learned what really drove him — and it was darker than anyone expected. Ruth later told investigators that Mark believed the cops were coming for them. He wanted to crash the car,
Mark, only 23, faced multiple charges: attempted murder of police officers, aggravated assault, eluding, criminal mischief, and injuring a police K9. Ruth, 42, was charged with making terroristic threats and obstruction. Both were held without bond. Tango, the K9, and the injured officers eventually recovered — but emotionally, the scars ran deep.
For the police who lived through that night, the silence afterward was haunting. One officer later said, “I was hiding beside a house, hoping he wouldn’t see me. If he had, I would’ve had no choice but to shoot.” Another admitted he couldn’t sleep for days, replaying the moment the car lunged at him.
This wasn’t just another reckless suspect. Mark weaponized his car and turned an ordinary neighborhood into a demolition zone. It was sheer luck — or fate — that no officer was killed. The K9 vehicle, crushed and smoking, stood as a grim reminder of how close the night came to tragedy.
Experts say that in 2024 alone, more officers died by vehicles than by gunfire — a chilling statistic that underscores how deadly the streets have become. And while the public often sees the flashing lights and dramatic arrests, few see the quiet aftermath — the shaking hands, the sleepless nights, the mental replay that never fades.
For the officers that night, survival came down to seconds. A few inches, a few heartbeats, and it could have ended in funerals instead of reports. As dawn broke, the once-peaceful street was littered with debris, shattered glass, and the lingering echo of chaos.
Mark and Ruth sat in separate cells, facing charges that would alter their lives forever. The officers returned home, alive but changed — knowing that the line between life and death had never been thinner.
That night wasn’t just another call.
It was a real-life horror movie — and every cop there was forced to play a part.